Art

Lately, I’ve been writing about things such as digital humanities, art as research and a somewhat new field called Creative Inquiry, mentioned in the last post as an academic program founded at New College and thriving today at CIIS in San Francisco, as well as other colleges and universities. I remember reading comments about creative inquiry on a social network one day and someone posted, “Creative Inquiry! What??? They’ve got to be kidding.” The assumption quite clearly being, that creative inquiry could never be taken seriously as a field of research.

One might ask how could one realistically do research into the arts without such an epistemological construct. Of course science can and has a place in research of the arts, but the two are not mutually exclusive. According to the CIIS Creative Inquiry MFA Program website, creative inquiry explores how artists can collaborate with and feed each other across disciplines, experiment with cross-disciplinary approaches to art-making, and explore how artists can collaborate with and feed each other across disciplines, and learn to contextualize their art and investigate how it can reflect or aid social change by transgressing or breaking through personal and cultural barriers.

Such inquiries can be approached for unimaginable numbers of perspectives, including art history and theory, aesthetics, philosophy, social research, communications and media theory to name just a few. One example is the long posed artistic question, “Is a work of art changed in some way by virtue of the fact that it is observed.” Many artists base their work on a question like this, and was studied at length by the late, German philosopher, writer and social activist Walter Benjamin, among others, whose work I will write about soon.

Well I wanted you to hear more about it from one of the faculty in CIIS’ Creative Inquiry MFA Program, Kris Brandenburger, whom I know, and has been in the vanguard of cutting-edge art education for many years. Thank you, Kris.

What is Creative Inquiry? 
By Kris Brandenburger, writer, mechanic, and faculty member in the Creative Inquiry, Interdisciplinary Arts MFA Program and the Bachelor of Arts Completion Program 

“To be an artist is to ask questions, to probe material in search of its weakness, strength, durability, vulnerability, in search of some unknown thing that is and is not the material, to make associations with or to find the correspondences between the limited matter at hand and the larger world, to articulate—visually, aurally, structurally, metaphorically—something intuitively if not intellectually known, to configure/constrain matter within a conflicting and/or contrapuntal form in order to persuade the invisible (the unknown) to emanate”. Read the rest of this entry »

Trafik is a group of graphic designers and programmers who have evolved their work into generative computer installations in addition to the more conventional work they do. But clearly, interactive, installation based mediua is what motivates Trafik, and along with many other artists and programmers who are at the cutting edge, helping to redefine fine art and modern art in our time.

Multi-disciplinary illumination specialists

Aliases: Pierre Rodière, Julien Sappa, Joel Rodière
Location: Lyon, France
Profession: Art directors, graphic designers
Website: Lavitrinedetrafik.fr
Notable works: 72 (2011); Gold (2010); Muséogames (2010); Saturday Light (2009)
Connect: Facebook

 

While efforts in this regard certainly made large impact at the beginning of the last century, in the middle of the century, and again in the 80′s, say, the postmodern era, we see that this evolution is not completely new. But today we are seeing renewed and evolved thinking about using the arts and other creative-based disciplines as a means of research. Art as research you say? Just another nut job from California you say? Perhaps, but I think not.

I have spent the last 20 years making this a personal field of study, in part because the apparent duality of the paradigm matches both my persona and my professional work.

Science. All those tubes and wires.Double-blind, peer-reviewed, journal certified scientific research. Documented, proven test results. I’m all for that really, and do not write here to propose that scientific research is “bad,” or should be changed. Just that there are important alternatives. And it seems I have a lot of company.

Having stated the above it might be natural to assume that what I’m doing is some sort of narcissistic folly.. wanting to believe there is more meaning in my own artwork and other creative endeavors, and that of so many others that I regards as heroes, geniuses, everyday people who changed the world by their thoughts and their creations. Believing that there is something new, quantifiable, tangible and very worth researching. Again, I’m sure I’m not alone in thinking that.

I was fortunate enough to be at New College in San Francisco as a graduate student  in the 00′s when Humanities faculty, including Dr. Judy Grahn Anne Bluthenthal and Neeli Cherkovski, among others, founded the Creative Inquiry program there. I remember seeing a media snippet or social media comment from people laughing or thumbing their noses at such a far flung attempt at epistemological classification. An attempt to reify something so non-verbal, so ethereal, so emotional. Well, having studied in that program I can tell you it was one of the best academic programs I’ve had the pleasure of studying in.

(Note: updated 1/14/12:) I neglected to mention that the Creative Inquiry MFA Program is now thriving at CIIS in San Francisco, the California Institute For Integral Studies. A one of a kind program worthy of a closer look.)

Part of this and other related blog posts is an attempt to aggregate material for a book, since this is a subject that really must be approached in real form. But if you come across this, or  social media links, I’d be interested in hearing from you if you are involved in creative inquiry or a related field, and hear about how you approach these subjects.

One would think that the deconstructions that are part of postmodernism would have resulted in much larger efforts to to make the arts a primary form of inquiry. It is partially from that perspective that I regard Grahn, Cherkovski and others who have made progress in these fields of study as part of that group of heroes, in the vanguard of research of human thought and expression. I can’t speak for them, but as an observer I can say that one trait common to these folks was the strength of their convictions; the belief, the knowledge that these are very legitimate forms of academic pursuit and do not need to be “further legitimized by another group’s values and criteria.” 1

I think since the study of postmodernism began we have seen a convergence of disciplinary thinking from what might previously have been considered widely different and not necessarily considered to be an appropriate merging of thought. Again, this is not completely new. An example might be Kant, or how Arthur C. Danto restructured the concept of aesthetics to  more fully include the concepts used in art today. Consider how Buddhism or other Eastern spiritualities, or how physics suggests that how a phenomenon is observed affects how the phenomenon behaves.2

Continued discussion will include the work of Walter Benjamin and others, whose philosophies laid the groundwork for changing the discourse about the means of production of art, mechanical reproduction, and later computers, and all that implies for how work of many artists has changed and the art world along with it.

 

 

1. McNiff, Shaun. (1998). Art-Based Research. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

2. McNiff, Shaun. (1998). Art-Based Research. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

 

 

 

 

News Bites